FireCARES: Community Assessment/Response Evaluation System
UL FSRI
October 31, 2016
On-going 'Big Data' project to assess community risk and fire department performance.
Overview

The UL Firefighter Safety Research Institute (FSRI) has been working with partners from the IAFF, CFAI, University of Texas-Austin, NIST, and the Urban Institute among other to help develop FireCARES. FireCARES has been developed through support from the Assistance to Firefighter Grant Program through Fire Prevention and Safety Grants.

FireCARES (firecares.org) is designed to analyze how fire department resources are deployed to match community risks. Local government decision makers often alter fire department resources faster than fire service leaders can evaluate the potential impact. These decisions can leave a community without sufficient resources to respond to emergency calls safely, efficiently, and effectively. These decisions can have even greater impact on vulnerable populations including the elderly, young children, and people with disabilities. FireCARES – Community Assessment, Response Evaluation System - is an analytical system designed to evaluate community risk and fire department operational performance using national data layers in a geographic-based system. The FireCARES project provides fire departments the ability to add a technical basis to what has historically been an anecdotal discussion regarding community hazards and risks as well as the impact of changes to fire department resource levels.

The goal of the project is to aggregate national and local data to provide answers that both public and fire service leaders have not previously had. To accomplish this task, FireCARES will provide three scores for each community dependent on the available data: the Community Risk Score, the Fire Department Performance Score, and the Safe Grade.

Read more…

Community Risk

The community risk score was developed as a function of the socio-demographic and geographic characteristics of the locations (census tracts) of reported structure fires over a seven year period (2008-2014) according to available NFIRS data. The socio-demographic attributes include:

  • Population characteristics (e.g., size category of the department, population, number of males, age group counts, race counts)
  • Housing characteristics (e.g., total housing units, total vacancies, size of home, number of renters, age of units)
  • Household characteristics (e.g., median household income, social vulnerability index)
  • Geographic region

Fire Department Performance Score

The goal of the fire department performance score is to assess how well a fire department performs compared to the “standardized” version of itself. One component of this metric is the structure fire spread category from the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). This category provides information which quantifies the fire spread in a structure from confined to object of origin through spread beyond structure of origin. There are five categories defined in NFIRS, but for this analysis the data are collapsed into three categories: room of origin (lumping object and room together), floor of origin (lumping floor and structure together), and beyond structure of origin. The resulting distribution (count of fires in each of the three bins) of fire spread is the basis for comparison for developing the performance score.

The second component of this score is the model that defines how the fire department would perform if it were acting as a standard, idealized version of itself. The concept is that there exists a theoretical version of every fire department where all responses meet or exceed the national standards governing department performance. Essentially, a fire department responding to a fire must complete a series of tasks before they can put water on the fire. For purposes of this model these tasks are broken up as follows:

  • Time to alarm - Time required before the fire is noticed, and some form of action is taken [NIST TN 1661, NIST TN 1797].
  • Time to dispatch - Time required for dispatch operator to obtain enough information regarding the fire and location to issue a dispatch [NFPA 1710].
  • Time to turnout - Time required for firefighter turnout [NFPA 1710].
  • Time to arrival - Transit time required for engine between station and fire location [NFPA 1710, GIS].
  • Time to ascend - Transit time required for firefighters to ascend to the staging floor for fires in buildings. Data for ascent was gathered from timed 27-story climb experiments with 35 firefighters of varying age, height, weight, and gender. Note this parameter is only enacted when staging would occur above ground level.
  • Time to suppress - Time required for firefighters on-scene to put water onto fire (includes size-up, hose connection, etc.) [NIST TN 1661, NIST TN 1797]

When water is put onto a fire, the idealized fire is assumed to have reached the peak size. The growth time for the fire is equivalent to the sum of the tasks the fire department must perform to suppress the fire. This time to suppression is coupled to a simple exponential area damage growth model which is consistent with fire statistics literature. A distribution of fire spread is generated using the same three NFIRS bins discussed above, based on the modeled area of fire damage at the suppression time. Distributions of the room and building sizes are estimated from the American Housing Survey’s (AHS) national survey of residential homes. Where available, it is possible to use the AHS metropolitan statistical areas to refine room and building distributions for larger metropolitan areas.

The concept is that there exists an average time correction for all fire department structure fire responses routed through the idealized fire department model that “corrects” the fire damage outcomes expected from national standards to the particular outcomes observed by a given fire department. This average correction time is known as the fire department performance score.

Safe Grade

A community’s set of safe grades represent an assessment of the number of fires, of fire spread, and of civilian and firefighter injury or death based on how well the Fire Department resources (performance score) match the level of risks within the community (risk score). There are 3 safe grade comparison categories:

  • Performance based on number of fires
  • Performance based on fire spread
  • Performance based on injury and death

There are three Safe Grades in total. The Safe Grades compare the local department against similar departments a based on the risk group (low, medium, high) the community falls within for the respective category (see above).

VIDEOS
MORE FROM THIS PROJECT
PROJECT PARTNERS
UL Firefighter Safety Research Institute is dedicated to increasing firefighter knowledge to reduce injuries and deaths in the fire service and in the communities they serve.